
Brett Mize
The First Amendment of the U.S. Bill of Rights guarantees us many of our basic rights including the freedom of the press. A free press is vital to liberty and to the society in which we enjoy. Thomas Jefferson noted the benefit of an open media when he stated, “Where the press is free, and every man able to read, all is safe.”
Many consider the media to be the fourth pillar of democracy – along with the executive, legislative and judicial branches. Only by allowing open access to information can citizens make informed decisions. In a democracy where responsibility should be shouldered by everyone, only a free press allows citizens to inform themselves and come to their own conclusions.
An open media not only serves to inform the public at large, but also serves as a watchdog for elected officials and other government functions. Elected officials are held accountable and must beware of being exposed if they are not acting in ways that some might consider not in their best interest.
While The Bulletin here at ESU might not be investigating CIA interrogation techniques or corrupt Washington politicians, we do provide a purposeful outlet for informing students on campus as well as being a “watchdog” for administration and elected officials. Students have the right to know what decisions are being made around them and the newspaper has a right to report that information.
What makes a school newspaper valuable to the students is the fact that the purpose is to inform students of their school’s activities – the reader decides if the activities are good, bad, or neither. That value is compromised when the newspaper is no longer allowed to inform its readers freely. This happens when a newspaper becomes censored. Censorship nearly always occurs through a step known as “prior review.”
Prior review is the act of persons in an executive role reading materials before they have been made available to the public. Prior review here at ESU would mean that administrative officials would have the ability to read over The Bulletin before the paper was published. This may seem harmless. The reality is prior review nearly always opens the door for prior restraint and censorship.
What’s the point of prior review if it is not followed by censorship? Administrators would not simply read the paper before publication to get the information before the students and faculty. Why else would administrators want to issue prior review before publication if not only to have the authority to kill or alter a story?
Prior review being enforced on school newspapers is a disservice to all students, including the aspiring journalist. Fully and independently operating a campus newspaper is the best educational and training tool available for those seeking a career in journalism.
Prior review would serve only to stifle critical thinking and brings down the quality of a news source. Once the students no longer have sole independence over their newspaper, a lowering of quality, creativeness and accuracy is sure to follow.
I know if I were told by someone “above me” what I could or could not write about, I would no longer write for the paper. Would the investigative reporter continue to work as hard and ask as tough questions if there was a good chance their hard work would be altered or censored? I doubt it.
Once censorship sets in, which is what only logically follows behind prior review; writers will give up most of their motivation to question and to challenge. Once this happens, who will take their work seriously and listen to their voice? There isn’t much point in a newspaper if the readers feel like they are simply another public relations outlet for the administration.
If the school newspaper were to become censored, who is to say that other organizations on campus would not be as well? It’s not a stretch to say once a newspaper is silenced that the rest of the student voice is in jeopardy as well. Maybe RSOs on campus shouldn’t be able to raise important issues on campus – their activities may be not on par with what others think they should be doing. Maybe the theatre department should only be able to choose from a select few “appropriate” plays a year. The list goes on, but obviously this is a slippery-slope issue.
We enjoy a university that allows students open access to the news and events that are impacting their lives here at ESU. Let’s keep it that way with an open and transparent campus atmosphere.
Brett Mize/The Bulletin





























Recent Comments