Triggered by what multiple sources said was an alleged physical confrontation at a Kappa Sigma party last month, the Judicial Review Board of the Interfraternity Council held a disciplinary hearing on Tuesday and Wednesday.
The hearing was closed and JRB met in multiple locations over a two day period, starting at 8 p.m. Tuesday in the Flint Hills Room of the Memorial. When the building closed at 10 p.m., the board relocated to a meeting room on the fourth floor of William Allen White Library until 11 p.m. when the library closed. JRB met again yesterday at 9 p.m. in a Towers Complex Conference room and adjourned after about 45 minutes.
Joseph Marten, junior and chief justice of JRB, refused to comment on anything that was discussed but did say that the board had made its decision, though he would not say what it was. It must be sent in writing to both of the parties involved within five days.
After that, any appeals will be handled by the Appellate Board, which consists of Jason Bosch, assistant director of student involvement for Greek life, Assistant Vice President of Strategic Partnerships Lynn Hobson, and IFC President Cody Pritchard, senior secondary mathematics education major.
Three confidential sources said the JRB hearing was taking place because there had been confrontation between a student who attended a party at Kappa Sigma and a member of Kappa Sigma. The student was allegedly asked to leave and refused.
Two eyewitnesses said when they entered the party, they had to sign in, show their ID and were marked because they are underage. They both noted a “black list,” which held the names of people who were not allowed in the party.
The student who was later escorted out was on the “black list,” said Kyle Lococo, president of Kappa Sigma. He refused further comment on the party or the hearing.
It is unclear whether the disciplinary action is targeted at the student, a Kappa Sigma Member or the entire Kappa Sigma fraternity. All parties refused comment.
One eyewitness said underage drinking did not occur at the party, while another said it did. However, both agreed that alcohol was a factor. They also agreed that there was confrontation as the student was asked to leave the party.
“(The student) threw a huge fit, (his or her) arms were flailing and (he or she) was kicking and was like ‘no, no, no, I don’t have to leave,’ and then finally they calmed (him or her) down and (the student) said ‘fine, I’ll go,’” said an eyewitness who testified at the hearing. “They were walking up the stairs and I don’t really know what happened on the stairwell.”
Another eyewitness at the party noted the same incident.
“(The student) had been asked to leave and didn’t at first,” said the eyewitness. “So they tried to lead (him or her) upstairs and (he or she) was all twisting and turning and then it turned into a huge confrontation in the staircase and you could kind of hear it and then they left and afterwards it got really quiet there were lots of whispers and no one could really tell what was going on for sure.”
Accounts of what happened on the stairwell varied, but all witnesses agreed that there was confrontation and two of them said it was physical.
The parties involved will receive the decision by the JRB in writing and from there will decide whether or not they would like the case to be reviewed by the Appellate Board. Lococo said he expects the process to extend over the next few weeks.






















Recent Comments